Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta persecución política. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta persecución política. Mostrar todas las entradas

martes, 2 de mayo de 2023

Denuncian al terrorista Taiana por remover a un general por cuestiones ideológicas

Denuncian a Jorge Taiana en la Justicia Federal por remover a un general del Ejército por cuestiones ideológicas


Por Bryan J. Mayer  ||  Derecha Diario

La denuncia fue realizada por el Dr. Eduardo Sinforiano San Emeterio, quien argumenta que si el general Soloaga cometió un delito deberían denunciarlo ante la justicia además de expulsarlo, pero no lo han hecho.




Tras la escandalosa expulsión de la presidencia de la Comisión del Arma de Caballería del General de Brigada retirado Rodrigo Soloaga a manos del ministro de Defensa -el ex guerrillero comunista- Jorge Taiana, el Dr. Eduardo Sinforiano San Emeterio presentó una denuncia contra el Gobierno en la Justicia Federal.

Según el ministro, su remoción se debió a sus dichos el pasado 25 de abril, durante un acto oficial de las Fuerzas, cuando el general Soloaga ofreció “apoyo espiritual” a los camaradas detenidos, muchos sin procesamiento o sentencia, “como consecuencia de haber cumplido funciones en las filas de la Fuerza durante una difícil época para nuestro país“.

Si Taiana y Jozami consideran que el General Soloaga cometió apología del terrorismo de Estado, están obligados a realizar una denuncia, como indica el artículo 248 del Código Penal Argentino”, señala al autor de la denuncia, y es parte de lo que fundamenta en su denuncia contra el ministro de Defensa y contra el Director de Derechos Humanos de esa cartera, Eduardo Jozami.

En la nota, dirigida electrónicamente a la Cámara Federal de Casación Penal, el abogado indica que “dichos altos funcionarios evidentemente sólo se limitaron a formular dicha falsa acusación al señor General, en el ámbito administrativo y no en el que por obligación de sus cargos e imputación por un delito inexistente y no encuadrado en figura penal alguna, deberían haber formulado ante la Justicia Penal Federal“.

“Independientemente de considerar que el señor General Soloaga no ha cometido delito alguno, pues no ha incurrido en la mal calificada “Apología del Delito”, los que sí han cometido el delito de no cumplir con sus obligaciones legales son los dos funcionarios denunciados al no recurrir a la justicia y formular la correspondiente denuncia penal”, argumentó.

Para el denunciante, por otra parte, haber pedido información personal de los militares participantes de la ceremonia “es una violación al derecho a la intimidad” y también un “abuso de autoridad, puesto que pedir los legajos personales de los efectivos o el listado de los civiles presentes tuviera sentido si lo hace un juez, con los elementos necesarios que justifiquen algo así y no dos funcionarios administrativos que responden a una cuestión ideológica y sin ningún tipo de sustento”.

Entre los participantes también había periodistas, por lo que San Emeterio apunta que “también Taiana y Jozami atentan contra la libertad de prensa y presionan a quienes intentan ejercerla”.

En la denuncia, se solicita que “se convoque a indagatoria a los denunciados” y se cita como prueba parte de la nota enviada por el ministerio de Defensa al teniente general Guillermo Olegario Pereda, donde se solicita una gran cantidad de datos personales y documentación de las personas y entidades afectadas a la ceremonia, al General Soloaga y a su entorno.

martes, 31 de diciembre de 2019

INADI de Donda busca suprimir el juramento a la Bandera

El INADI busca prohibir el Juramento a la Bandera


En marzo del año 2018 ya habían intentado el mismo objetivo, sin logro aparente.

El Ancla MdP

 

El Instituto Nacional contra la Discriminación, la Xenofobia y el Racismo busca prohibir el Juramento a la Bandera, por considerarlo un acto ''similar al saludo Nazi''. Resulta ser la segunda vez que pretenden tal acto, ya que en marzo del año pasado intentaron el mismo acto sin llegar a buen puerto.

Victoria Donda, del espacio político Somos, es la titular del organismo, tras haber sido confirmada por el actual mandatario Alberto Fernández.

Dicha institución se fundó durante la presidencia de Carlos Saúl Menem, con la ayuda de la financiación de operadoras británicas. Las mismas son provenientes de movimientos LGBT, Feministas y precursores de la Ideología de Género.




La idea de suprimir el Juramento a la Bandera en los colegios, surge por su similitud con el Saludo romano, el cual consideran que ''promueve el odio hacía otras culturas por jurar y defender una sola bandera, ya que el mundo es multicultural, multipolar e inclusivo''.

Actualmente no ha sido puesta en función la dirigente del Frente de Todos, sin embargo ya ha mostrado su interés en acabar con el culto a la Patria. Algo totalmente inadecuado.



miércoles, 25 de diciembre de 2019

Venganza sin fin: Frederic va a revisar lo actuado por GNA en el ahogado caso Maldonado

Frederic dijo que revisará "la actuación de la Gendarmería" en el caso Maldonado


Por José María González
Tribuna de Periodistas


Arrancaron con todo, como se preveía

Este martes, la ministra de Seguridad, Sabina Frederic, anunció que se va a "revisar la actuación disciplinaria" de los efectivos de la Gendarmería Nacional involucrados en los casos de Santiago Maldonado y Rafael Nahuel, y que se le brindará la información a la Justicia para "esclarecer" los hechos. Es una medida que se preveía que ocurriría, al igual que la desactivación de los protocolos de Patricia Bullrich.



"Vamos a revisar la actuación disciplinaria en ambos casos de los efectivos que participaron del operativo y toda la cadena de mando para deslindar o determinar responsabilidades de todos los que participaron", dijo la ministra en diálogo con radio Metro.

Al ser consultada sobre si cree que el operativo de Gendarmería tuvo responsabilidad en la muerte de Maldonado -el joven artesano que estuvo desaparecido durante 77 días tras un violento desalojo de una protesta mapuche en Chubut, hasta que su cuerpo fue hallado sumergido en el río-, Frederic contestó: "Sí, sí, creo que el operativo fue pésimamente realizado, tuvo decisiones desacertadas y fuera de los protocolos, y hubo responsabilidades".

"Todas las decisiones estuvieron mal y los oficiales lo saben", consideró la ministra.

En ese marco, anunció que -tras la revisión de los casos- la cartera a su cargo le dará "toda la información a la Justicia para esclarecer el hecho", y aclaró: "Somos el Ministerio de Seguridad, no el de Justicia".

El 12 de diciembre pasado, la Cámara Federal de Casación Penal avaló la reapertura de la causa por la muerte de Maldonado, al señalar que restaban realizar medidas de prueba e instó a que se designe un nuevo juez.

miércoles, 18 de diciembre de 2019

Agustín "misil" Rossi: Confirma purga en los mandos militares

Agustín Rossi: “Haremos un recambio en las cúpulas militares, pero no una purga"

En una entrevista con Infobae, el ministro de Defensa habló de la revisión de la reglamentación de la ley de Defensa, el reequipamiento militar, el relevo de las cúpulas y la cuestión salarial que figuran entre los ejes de acción de la nueva etapa del ex diputado kirchnerista en el ministerio
Por Fernando Morales || Infobae


 
"Tengo el mejor de los conceptos de los actuales jefes militares. Haremos un recambio no una purga", dijo Rossi confirmando que efectivamente es una purga.

Distendido y con puntualidad castrense, el flamante Ministro de Defensa de la Nación arribó al estudio de Infobae con la intención de esbozar lo que serán los lineamientos de su “segundo tiempo” al frente de la “cartera militar”.

Sin dejar de abordar ninguno de los temas propuestos, la entrevista se da a pocas horas de producirse el recambio de la totalidad de los altos mandos militares. Y los oficiales salientes lo hacen gozando de un profundo reconocimiento por parte del actual ministro.

-Si en algo están de acuerdo la dirigencia política y la sociedad en su conjunto, es en lo que no se quiere que los militares vuelvan a hacer. Pero no parece haber tal acuerdo a la hora de definir qué es lo que se quiere que los militares hagan concretamente. ¿Podría explicarlo?

-Durante muchos años, y por las causas que todos sabemos, se ocupó mucho tiempo en la Argentina debatiendo la cuestión militar, siendo en mi opinión esta cuestión la que se relaciona con la situación de los militares respecto a la democracia y los derechos humanos. Esto arrinconó la posibilidad de poder debatir acerca del rol de las Fuerzas Armadas y qué política de defensa queremos. Ahora estamos frente a una oportunidad para hacerlo: mi idea es sentar las bases a partir de consensos necesarios para poder fijar el rumbo de la defensa.

Sin dudas, para el ministro Rossi hay una serie de factores básicos que no pueden ser soslayados: el cuidado del espacio aéreo y del litoral marítimo, el aprovechamiento de despliegue territorial del Ejército de una forma más integral, la actividad antártica, las misiones de paz y la ciberdefensa se encuentran entre los principales. En forma concurrente, el reequipamiento de las instituciones militares, según el funcionario, es imprescindible. En este aspecto la visión de Rossi se resume en el siguiente concepto:

“Si mañana tenemos la posibilidad de tener un escuadrón supersónico para la Fuerzas Armadas, ello no significa que ampliemos nuestro poderío bélico, pero sí significa que podremos tener pilotos entrenados en este tipo de tecnología y en forma concurrente esto nos permitirá tener un fuerte anclaje en lo que significa el fomento de la industria para la defensa, lo que a todas luces tiene un valor agregado muy importante ya que es una industria estratégica y genera puestos de trabajo fortaleciendo la cadena de proveedores".

 
Agustín Rossi en Infobae

La industria para la defensa

En este tema, al menos, se aprecia una interesante intención de continuar y mejorar la importancia que la anterior gestión le dio al área de producción para defensa, ya que Agustín Rossi puso particular énfasis en la actividad llevada adelante por Fabricaciones Militares, FAdeA y el astillero Tandanor. De la misma forma el ministro fue taxativo al expresar la necesidad de hacer acuerdos estratégicos con el INVAP. “La inversión y desarrollo en materia de tecnología es uno de los pilares en los que debemos apoyar la actividad de las Fuerzas Armadas”, sentenció.

Con realismo, Rossi destacó. “No vamos a tener Fuerzas Armadas reconocidas por su volumen, no no podemos comparar con Brasil ni con Colombia, pero sí tenemos que ser reconocidos por lo mejor que tenemos, que es el recurso humano con su nivel de preparación y de desarrollo científico y tecnológico, realmente muy alto”.

Vuelta atrás con la orgánica militar

-Una de las primeras medidas que usted adoptó al asumir fue derogar las estructuras orgánicas que la gestión saliente había aprobado unos días antes de dejar el poder. ¿No considera que, a pesar de los constantes cambios, la ausencia de la figura de comandante en jefe de cada fuerza resulta perjudicial a la hora de asumir responsabilidades?

-Yo no me ato a una única estructura, pero me siento más cómodo con la estructura que volví a poner en funciones, me gusta la idea de tener un subjefe de fuerza que maneje todo lo técnico y un comandante de alistamiento que tenga “los fierros” a su cargo. La estructura que aprobó el anterior gobierno terminaba dándole más poder al los subjefes que a los propios jefes de Estado Mayor. No creo que la figura del jefe de Estado Mayor sea inadecuada, por el contrario tiene la posibilidad de conducir con muchísima mayor transparencia ambas partes de la estructura sin tener que recorrer caminos sinuosos. Me pareció muy poco gentil que me cambien la estructura de las Fuerzas Armadas a cuatro días del momento en que yo debía asumir.

La reglamentaciòn de la Ley de Defensa

-A diferencia de la crítica que puede merecer el cambio de organigramas sobre el fin de la gestión, hace ya varios meses se modificó el decreto reglamentario de la Ley de Defensa, ampliado las eventuales hipótesis que ameritan el empleo del instrumento militar. Narcotráfico, terrorismo internacional, ataque a objetivos vitales del país y otros ampliaron el -hasta ese momento- único motivo para el que ley habilitaba la movilización militar y que no era otro que el supuesto ataque al territorio nacional por parte de un ejército extranjero. ¿Pondrá en revisión el decreto 683/18?

-Definitivamente, el decreto será revisado. Ahora si como me han dicho, el actual operativo “Integración” se limita al desarrollo de ejercitaciones militares en las zonas calientes de la frontera con el objetivo de marcar presencia en el terreno y evitar de esta manera que el narco ingrese al país por zonas poco vigiladas, no veo por qué no continuar con su desarrollo, pero realmente para hacer esto no hacía falta cambiar ningún decreto. Así que podemos revisarlo sin que ello implique suspender una actividad militar si la misma resulta útil.

Recuerdo cuando de visita en México hace unos pocos años, me explicaron que estaban conformando una suerte de Gendarmería para combatir al narcotráfico. Nosotros eso ya lo tenemos desde hace muchísimos años. Nuestra Gendarmería y Prefectura son fuerzas aptas para el combate del narcotráfico.

Accionar conjunto entre Armada y Prefectura Naval

-La Argentina es uno de los países de la región que tienen una Armada y una Prefectura operando como fuerza independiente y se dan una serie de situaciones en donde las misiones de ambas fuerzas parecen superponerse. ¿Considera que se podría armonizar la labor de ambas fuerzas al menos para racionalizar el gasto?

-Habría que analizarlo y estoy dispuesto a hacerlo, no tengo ningún tipo de inconveniente, máxime considerando que en los últimos tiempos la presencia de Prefectura en el mar es mucho más intensa que la de la Armada. Hay que intentar llevar adelante la tarea con el mejor aprovechamiento de los recursos posibles. Ya en mi anterior gestión habíamos iniciado el estudio para crear una estructura similar a la que ideamos con la Fuerza Aérea para el control del espacio aéreo.

 
Rossi asumió por segunda vez el cargo de ministro de Defensa el pasado 10 de diciembre (Gustavo Gavotti)

Fuerza de submarinos

“Lo que pasó con el ARA San Juan es una tragedia para la fuerza, Hay que trabajar mucho en recuperar la autoestima de la Armada, necesitamos darle un horizonte”. Debe recordarse que la MLU se realizó durante la gestión de la procesada ex-presidente Cristina Fernández de Kirchner.

-La desaparición del San Juan fue dejó al país sin fuerza submarina. ¿Dentro de los propósitos del fondo para la defensa que usted impulsó se considera la recuperación de esta capacidad estratégica?

-Hoy la situación es la siguiente: sólo tenemos al submarino ARA Salta que no está en condiciones de inmersión. Nuestros submarinistas realizan en el algunas prácticas propias de su formación y luego se van a terminar sus estudios en Perú o Brasil y es evidente que si no recuperamos la capacidad submarina estos conocimientos se van a perder. Las armadas en el mundo tienen portaaviones y submarinos, ahora la negociación que había con Brasil por dos submarinos fracasó y respecto a la reparación del Santa Cruz tengo información cruzada con criterios dispares. El pasado viernes el Almirante Villán me informó que hay una tratativa de compra de unidades más pequeñas provenientes de la Armada noruega. Todas las posibilidades van a ser analizadas, pero tenemos que contar con fuerza submarina.

Inquietud de la industria naval nacional

-En este momento hay una partida de aproximadamente U$S 200.000.000 para construir en el exterior un buque polar que ha generado bastante malestar en referentes de la industria naval local, que elevan su voz ante la falta de consultas en el mercado local. ¿Es viable fomentar construcciones navales de este tipo en el mercado interno?

-Sin duda, no tendríamos que hacer ninguna construcción en el exterior que no venga de la mano de transferencia de tecnología. Si hacemos patrulleros oceánicos, debemos tener la posibilidad de contar con la patente de construcción para luego hacerlo aquí y nuestra gente de esta manera participa de esas construcciones. Por lo que conozco, tanto en Tandanor como en Río Santiago estamos en perfectas condiciones de construir un buque polar como el que necesitamos. Siempre tendré preferencia por construir en el país.

 
Rossi: "Hay que trabajar mucho en recuperar la autoestima de la Armada" (Gustavo Gavotti)


-Usted encuentra hoy al mando de las fuerzas a oficiales superiores ascendidos a esa condición durante la gestión de Cristina Kirchner y se apresta a colocar a las Fuerzas Armadas en manos de otros oficiales superiores llegados al alto mando durante la gestión de Mauricio Macri. ¿Hay algún militar que pueda albergar un pensamiento golpista?

-¡No, para nada. Hoy encontramos, por ejemplo, que el general Bari Sosa, que era director general de Educación durante mi gestión anterior, hoy es el Jefe del Estado Mayor Conjunto, y lo mismo ocurre con los otros jefes de las fuerzas. Seguramente serán relevados en los próximos días, pero quiero desterrar el concepto de “purga”: los jefes salientes se irán con todo mi reconocimiento porque entiendo que desde sus respectivos lugares hicieron lo que creyeron mejor para sus fuerzas. El recambio es necesario, entre otras cosas, para posibilitar el ascenso de los escalones inferiores. Si la cúpula se estanca, no hay posibilidad de promover a los cuadros más jóvenes. El proceso de retiro militar es parte integral de la profesión. Tenemos fuerzas armadas comprometidas con la democracia, comprometidas con la Nación.

Tampoco podemos sostener así como así que las cúpulas castrenses se encuentren sobredimensionadas. Si reducimos el número de generales pero aumentamos la cantidad de coroneles mayores para que hagan el trabajo de los generales que faltan, estamos en la misma. No hay que olvidar que alcanzar el generalato o las jerarquías equivalentes en las otras fuerzas es una legítima aspiración de todo ciudadano que abraza la carrera militar.

Redespliegue y salarios


-¿Tiene en mente algùn plan de redespliegue, cierre o fusión de unidades o alguna otra medida que implique una modificación de este estilo?
-Estoy abierto a analizar toda cuestión que se nos plantee en este sentido, siempre en función de determinar la mejor política de defensa, pero dentro de lo que pueda voy a tratar que la política fiscal no marque la política de defensa. Todo lo que tengamos que hacer lo haremos pero a partir de la convicción de que estamos haciendo lo mejor desde el punto de vista de una política de defensa. Es importante destacar en este sentido que el Fondef tiene como prioridad dar un panorama de certeza. Con un año de Fondef no solucionaremos los problemas, pero con el correr del tiempo tendremos previsibilidad en materia de inversión para equipamiento militar.

-¿Cuál es el mensaje para los cuadros militares en relación con la situación salarial?
-Hay que acortar dos brechas muy importantes, la primera es que hay eliminar la mayor cantidad de suplementos no remunerativos en el salario militar y, por otra parte, hay que reducir la enorme diferencia entre los sueldos de los uniformados militares con sus pares de las fuerzas de seguridad. Si no lo hacemos estamos siendo muy injustos con el personal militar y además lo estamos tentando a que, luego de formados, opten por pasarse a una fuerza policial. No podemos dejar de tener en cuenta además que el militar es el único ciudadano que en su juramento profesional se compromete a defender a la patria hasta perder la vida.

martes, 17 de diciembre de 2019

Cuba es una mierda: Pablo Milanés relata su experiencia en un campo de concentración

Impactante revelación de Pablo Milanés: "En la Cuba revolucionaria hubo campos de concentración y a mi también me enviaron allí"

El reconocido cantautor recordó cuando el régimen de Fidel Castro lo obligó a cumplir trabajos forzados en las Unidades Militares de Ayuda a la Producción (UMAP). "Condenaron a miles de muchachos jóvenes simplemente porque pensaban libremente", contó
Infobae

 

El cantautor cubano Pablo Milanés, uno de los fundadores del movimiento de la Nueva Trova Cubana, definió como "campos de concentración" a las Unidades Militares de Ayuda a la Producción (UMAP) que existieron en la isla entre 1965 y 1968.

En una entrevista del diario chileno La Tercera, Milanés habló de las UMAP como "un asunto muy oscuro de la historia de la Cuba revolucionaria" adonde miles de jóvenes fueron enviados a "reeducarse" por órdenes de Fidel Castro.

"Fue condenar a miles de muchachos jóvenes a campos de concentración simplemente porque pensaban libremente, ni siquiera porque pensaban lo contrario, sino porque eran librepensadores y tenían opiniones", expresó uno de los íconos de la música hispanoamericana.

Las UMAP funcionaron entre 1965 y 1968 y Pablo Milanés estuvo en uno de esos centros sometido a trabajos forzados, pero logró escapar y huyó hacia La Habana, donde luego fue encarcelado por desacato.

"Siempre lo recuerdo, pero nadie lo refleja nunca. Hago muchas entrevistas en Cuba y cuando hablo de las UMAP es como si hablara del diablo, porque es una pena que se lleva dentro, no han podido corregirla ni pedir perdón tampoco por lo que hicieron", dijo.

"Y no hablemos más de eso, porque fue un asunto muy muy oscuro de la historia de la Cuba revolucionaria: hubo campos de concentración. Fueron 50.000 jóvenes los que estuvieron en los campos de concentración, y entre ellos yo también", añadió.

El periodista de La Tercera le preguntó por qué siguió creyendo en la revolución después de eso que vivió. Y Milanés respondió: "Porque yo soy revolucionario. Ellos no, yo sí".

El músico de 75 años de edad no espera que el Gobierno cubano pida perdón alguna vez. "He dicho que pidan perdón, pero no lo han hecho", afirmó.

viernes, 13 de diciembre de 2019

Cómo Putin persigue y mata a sus opositores

How Russian Agents Hunt Down Kremlin Opponents

A secret Russian death squad appears to be killing Moscow's enemies in the West in an effort to destabilize Europe. Perpetrators with connections to the Russian government appear to be responsible for the slaying of a Georgian national in Berlin. By DER SPIEGEL Staff
Der Spiegel



Bernd von Jutrczenka/ DPA

The Russian Embassy in Berlin, where two workers have been expelled following the recent murder of a Georgian national.

In the summer of 2013, a killer in Moscow rode a bicycle toward his victim. The Russian businessman Albert Nazranov saw him, and a short brawl ensued. The killer shot the man in the head and upper body at close range. Then he rode away. All of that can be seen in surveillance footage of the crime.


In the summer of 2019, a killer also rode a bicycle toward his victim, only this time in Berlin. He shot Zelimkhan Khangoshvili, of Georgia, in the head and upper body at close range, before riding away. That's how witnesses described the scene.

Reporting by DER SPIEGEL, Bellingcat, The Insider and The Dossier Center now reveals that not only were both murders very similar -- they were also likely carried out by the same person. A forensic comparison of both perpetrator photos reveals clear similarities. The man who carried a passport bearing the name Vadim Sokolov in Berlin was the Russian Vadim Krasikov, the killer who is thought to have also struck in Moscow.

German General Federal Prosecutor Peter Frank has now assumed responsibility for the investigation into the Berlin murder case at the federal level because, he says, they are of "special importance." Germany's chief prosecutor believes that Russian government authorities deliberately issued Krasikov's new identity, an assumption based on the fact that Moscow took the surprising step in 2015 of revoking an international search warrant for Krasikov and issuing a new identity card to him with the name "Vadim Sokolov" a short time later. It's not likely to have been a coincidence.
International Newsletter: Sign up for our newsletter -- and get the very best of SPIEGEL in English sent to your email inbox twice weekly.


The Chief Federal Prosecutor's Office is accusing the Russian government or one of its henchmen of having murdered Khangoshvili in broad daylight at the end of August, a hitjob on German soil against a man who had come to the country as an asylum-seeker,

A similar crime committed in the United Kingdom last year sparked an international crisis when suspected agents with the Russian military intelligence agency GRU conducted an attack on former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter using the Russian neurotoxin Novichok. Twenty-nine countries expelled 146 Russian diplomats in response to the crime. Berlin also forced four representatives of Russia to leave the country.

A Slow Political Response

Despite the similarities, officials in Berlin seemed to be struggling in coming up with a political response to the Khangoshvili murder. For some time, officials said evidence in the case was too unclear. They argued that a fake ID in Russia could also be obtained through bribery and that it couldn't automatically be assumed that the Russian government had been involved.


But last Wednesday, just as the German federal prosecutor took over the case, the government in Berlin also adopted a tougher line. They ordered the chargé d'affaires at the Russian Embassy to the Foreign Ministry, where officials informed him that two staffers in the defense affairs division of the embassy, both of whom are believed by German security authorities to be members GRU intelligence service, would be expelled from Germany.

The Foreign Ministry justified the decision by saying that the cooperation by the Russian authorities has been "insufficient." "We view the expulsions as a very strong message to the Russian side to provide us with immediate and comprehensive support in clarifying the identity and background of the alleged perpetrator," said Helge Braun, chief of staff at Angela Merkel's Chancellery. "Given that there has been a lack of support for months, I have absolutely no comprehension of how Russia could be outraged or even be thinking about countermeasures."

Addressing a question about the case at last week's NATO summit in London, Chancellor Merkel stated: "We took this action because we have not seen Russian support in helping us solve this murder." Merkel has left open whether she will take up the issue with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Ukraine summit in Paris on Monday. But it's difficult to imagine that she wouldn't.

The government in Berlin wants to wait until the investigationsproceeds further before considering whether to take further punitive action against Moscow. Officials in the Chancellery are still wary about comparing the foreign policy fallout of the Khangoshvili killing with the Skripal case. But the circumstantial evidence is strong and there is much to suggest that Georgian national Zelimkhan Khangoshvili was killed for political reasons, even if Russia, as so often in the past, has denied all accusations.



Überwachungsvideo

A screen capture from the surveillance camera footage of the murder of Russian businessman Albert Nazranov in Moscow.

The sky over Berlin was steel blue on August 23 when, just before noon, Khangoshvili set out for his Friday prayers. His route to the mosque took him through the Kleiner Tiergarten, a park in Berlin's Moabit district.

Investigators firmly believe that the Georgian had been spied on and the killer knew the route he would take.

Guests were enjoying the sun in the park out in front of Café Alverdes when a man approached on a black mountain bike at 11:58 a.m. and abruptly began shooting. Two bullets fired from a 9mm pistol with a silencer struck Khangoshvili in the head.

The shooter, who fled by bike, stumbled briefly, injuring his leg, before taking a side street south for several hundred feet toward the bank of the Spree River, where he changed his clothes in the bushes. He packed his clothes and the Glock 26 pistol into a bag and sank it into the river at Lessing Bridge. He also threw the bicycle into the river as well as the wig and hair trimmer he likely used to alter his beard.

He continued his escape on a Volteboard e-scooter -- one that had been purchased, not rented. The perpetrator probably would have succeeded in escaping unscathed had it not been for two teens who had coincidentally been at the banks of the river and saw the whole spectacle as it unraveled. They watched as the man rapidly transformed himself and called the police, who then arrested the suspected killer at a nearby train station. One of his bags contained a powder designed to throw-off sniffer dogs, making it harder to track him. His return flight to Russia had been booked for the same weekend. The man denied the accusations against him at his arraignment and has remained silent ever since.

Initially, the Berlin Public Prosecutor's Office and a Berlin police homicide unit handled the investigation into the shooting. When local Chief Prosecutor Ralph Knispel, an expert on organized crime, appeared at the scene of the murder, there was initial speculation in the media that criminal gangs might be behind the slaying. But Knispel had another, more prosaic reason for being there: He is on call on Fridays.

But the speculation continued anyway. Given that the victim was a Chechen with a Georgian passport, many wondered if the murder might have been linked to gang rivalry. For a time in Germany, Khangoshvili had been classified as a potential Islamist threat, and some speculated that the link to his murder could be found there.

An Enemy of the Russian State

But investigators soon uncovered indications that Russia saw him as an enemy of the state. Khangoshvili comes from the Pankissi Valley in Georgia and when the second Chechen War broke out in 1999, many young people in the valley set out to join the fighting. Khangoshvili also took part, becoming a commander and a confidant of Chechen separatist leader and President Aslan Maskhadov, who was killed by the Russian secret service in 2005.

Khangoshvili returned from the war in 2004 and was possibly under surveillance from that point onward. Khangoshvili's ex-wife Manana T. says she is sure that she saw the spies standing on the street watching him. After her father was kidnapped, the two no longer felt safe and they fled to the Georgian capital Tbilisi. Once there, though, she says they kept receiving warning messages. In an interview with DER SPIEGEL, Manana T. recalled being told: "They're looking for you. You're in danger." She said her husband was shot at in the center of Tbilisi in 2015, but the perpetrator was never found.

The reason for the threat was likely Khangoshvili's role in the Chechen war, but also the fact that he subsequently worked for the Georgian security authorities. It is believed that information from him was passed on to the CIA in the United States -- current and former intelligence officials from Georgia, Ukraine and the U.S. have confirmed as much. "If the Americans or us needed information from the Chechen diaspora in Turkey, for example, Zelimkhan was our man," said a former Georgian official. "His work has saved lives," said another source.

In 2015, Khangoshvili fled to Ukraine, where he provided support for the Ukrainian government. At the time, many "Kadyrovsty," as the infamous fighters of the Chechen dictator Ramzan Kadyrov are known, were fighting in the eastern part of the country. At the end of 2016, Khangoshvili reached Germany, where he registered with the authorities under a different name.


DER SPIEGEL

At his asylum hearing in the city of Eisenhüttenstadt in the state of Brandenburg, he reported that he had fought against Russian troops and that he had already been the subject of an attack, which is why he was seeking asylum. Germany's domestic intelligence agency, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, researched his claims and sent a warning note to authorities in Brandenburg and Berlin on Feb. 21, 2017, with a copy also being sent to the Federal Criminal Police Office and the Federal Police. If Khangoshvili's presence in Germany became known, the agency warned, he could be in danger from "Chechens loyal to Kadyrov" or "pro-Russian actors," for example.

Shortly afterward, officials rejected his application, with the police classifying him as an Islamist threat at almost exactly the same time. That classification was based on a Russian claim that Khangoshvili belonged to a terrorist group called the Caucasian Emirate. It was only later, in June 2019, that officials in Berlin withdrew the Islamist threat classification. They had placed him under surveillance but found no indication that he might present any kind of threat. They also didn't see his murder coming.

Turning Point

Although investigators suspected from the very beginning that Russia could be behind the murder, they lacked evidence. The turning point came about a month ago when officials at the Berlin State Criminal Police Office discovered a five-year-old Interpol red notice in the files -- a manhunt request from Russia. The man in question was alleged to have murdered Vadim Kraskov in Moscow in 2013.

The manhunt photo was strikingly similar to the one of detained murder suspect Sokolov. Experts who have seen the image say it is "highly likely" that it is the same person.

Comparisons of the photos conducted by DER SPIEGEL and Bellingcat using facial recognition software and three different photos of Krasikov and one of Solokov showed matches of 82 to 90 percent.


Bellingcat/ DER SPIEGEL

Facial recognition software found close matches between photos of Krasikov and Solokov.

German investigators became suspicious about the fact that Russia had withdrawn its search request for Krasikov in the summer of 2015 for no apparent reason and only two months before an ID document was issued for the first time under the name "Sokolov." It's a strong indication that government agencies may have intervened. Perhaps a Russian secret service agency wanted to save an assassin from imprisonment so they could use him for their own purposes.

In their joint reporting and research into the killing, DER SPIEGEL and Bellingcat learned that Russian prosecutors had linked Krasikov in 2008 to the murder of an entrepreneur and local politician in the Karelia province that had been committed one year earlier. The case was reopened in the spring of 2015, according to local media reports, apparently because two men confessed they had been involved in the murder. But the case never went to trial.

Krasikov, as Russian flight databases show, later traveled to Kyrgyzstan under his real name. And beginning in 2016, he flew numerous times to Crimea, the Ukrainian peninsula occupied by Russia.

The question investigators are now seeking to address is that of who helped Krasikov aka "Sokolov" commit the murder in Berlin. Who spied on the victim, who supplied the perpetrator with the gun, the bike and the electric scooter? Was this an assassination ordered from Moscow or from the Chechen capital Grozny? Or was it part of a large-scale execution program directed by the Kremlin?

A Trail of Death in Europe

Either way, it does appear that a death squad dispatched from Moscow has left a trail of death in Europe over the past several years. "You can see there is a concerted program of activity," Alex Younger, the head of MI6, the British foreign intelligence, said in a rare briefing with journalists on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference earlier this year. "And yes, it does often involve the same people." The suspected assassins usually shoot their victims, but they also don't shy away from the use of poison.

After a dinner in April 2015, Emilian Gebrev suddenly began feeling discomfort. His eye wouldn't stop itching. It got worse the next day.

The Bulgarian arms manufacturer, who had supplied enemies of Russia, vomited and collapsed in a restaurant in Sofia before falling into a coma at the hospital. He had been poisoned, but doctors were unable to determine the substance used.

Gebrev barely survived that attack as well as another that followed a month later. Investigations by the authorities didn't go anywhere until the poison attack on Skripal and his daughter three years later.

The arms manufacturer from Bulgaria followed the reports and was puzzled by them. There were obvious parallels to his case: The victims had been on the Kremlin's radar for some time, they came into contact with a mysterious substance, and they barely survived. Gebrev informed the Public Prosecutor's Office, and the British and Bulgarian authorities began cooperating on the cases from that point on. No end is in sight yet for the investigations.

Links Between Attacks

But deeper research does show connections between the two murder attempts. Forty-five-year-old Denis Sergeev, a senior GRU officer and graduate of Russia's Military Diplomatic Academy, played a central role. Beginning in 2012, the agent, operating under the alias "Sergey Fedotov," traveled often to Europe and didn't have any difficult obtaining his visas.

Shortly before the Skripal assassination attempt, Sergeev traveled to England with a passport issued with the name Fedotov. It is believed that he acted as the local coordinator for the poison attack on Skripal from a London hotel room, a suspicion based on flight information and mobile-phone connection data.

It's likely he played the same role in the attack on the Bulgarian arms manufacturer. On April 24, 2015, Sergeev, alias Fedotov, set off for Bulgaria by direct flight from Moscow. He had booked his return flight for a week later. But Fedotov then took a last-minute flight via Istanbul back to Moscow on the evening of April 28, the very date that Emilian Gebrev collapsed in the restaurant and then fell into a coma. Just a coincidence? Unlikely.

Sergeev wasn't the only GRU employee to fly to Bulgaria during the period in question. Confidential documents from flight databases and passenger manifests document trips of eight GRU agents to the country. Presumably, they are all linked to the attempted murder. The GRU people were also in the country at the time of the second attack on the Bulgarian.

Attacks like these are coordinated by a unit that carries a five-digit number: 29155. The agents in the Skripal and Gebrev cases are members of this secret unit of the Russian military intelligence service GRU.

A Russian Campaign to Destabilize Europe

At the beginning of October, the New York Times became the first media organization to reporton how Western intelligence services now unanimously believe the unit has been responsible for a whole slew of subversive actions in Europe. There have been indications of the existence of the group for some time now.

Reporting by Bellingcat, The Insider and DER SPIEGEL reveals a detailed picture of the mission, structure and members of the unit -- and how it is linked to the Russian power apparatus.

The reporting shows that the team of around 20 soldiers and a highly decorated major general serves as a tool for a broad-based campaign by the Kremlin that aims to destabilize and weaken Europe. The GRU agents with Unit 29155 are just the kind of men for this kind of job -- they're ready when things get rough and they are trained for these types of sensitive operations abroad involving sabotage, subversion and assassinations. They're like shadow fighters.

By establishing the team within the military intelligence service, it falls under the authority of the Defense Ministry. However, the connection data from phone calls made during missions indicate that the agents sometimes received instructions from people close to the Russian president. The belief is that they are Putin's killers.



Alexei Nikolsky/ Sputnik/ Kremlin Pool/ EPA-EFE/ REX

Vladimir Putin: The reporting shows that people close to the Russian president were communicating with the agents at the times of the crimes.

Research conducted into numerous sources, including registries of Russian civilians, passport databases and websites of military academies, shows that the members of the squad for the most part have similar backgrounds. They are between their late 30s and mid-40s, graduates of respected academies and tend to have combat experience, such as in the wars in Chechnya or Ukraine. They often served in special military forces. Above all, though, they are ruthless.

The team was likely established in 2009. Entries in Russian military forums suggest that the unit was set up as a training department for special operations. A 2012 Defense Ministry decree mentions a bonus payment for a special "sub-unit" of this department -- a likely reference to the 20-member hit team.

The unit's presumed commander is Major General Andrei Averyanov, a graying man in his early 50s. According to entries in insurance databases, he lives in an upscale residential district outside Moscow.

A video shows an elegantly dressed Averyanov at his daughter's 2017 wedding, escorting her to the altar. One of the guests who can be clearly identified in the video is Anatoliy Chepiga, aka "Ruslan Boshirov," one of the two suspected perpetrators behind the poisoning of Sergei Skripal in Britain.

'We'll Get You No Matter Where You Are'

On the one hand, the agents operate in the utmost secrecy, but on the other, they make amateurish mistakes, such as in the Skripal case, where they were captured on numerous surveillance cameras and were quickly identified. "Too much is invested in these people to just use them up and throw them away," says a German security official. "On the other hand, though, the use of a rare neurotoxin is essentially a calling card. They want to ensure that the message is clear: 'We can do what we want.' And thus far, it must be said, the consequences have been slight." A second official says: "It's a form of communication: 'We'll get you no matter where you are.'"

It is difficult to determine where and how often members of the secret unit have struck in Europe. GRU agents travel under assumed names in many European Union countries. There are indications that the unit was involved in the failed 2016 overthrow attempt in Montenegro. The Spanish judiciary, meanwhile, is investigating possible destabilization efforts by the GRU in the conflict over Catalonia's independence. Investigators are particularly interested in two trips to Barcelona taken by the agent Fedotov. Then, on Wednesday, the French newspaper Le Monde reported that members of the Russian unit met regularly in the French Alps.

German investigators are now wondering whether Averyanov's men may have had something to do with the murder in the Berlin park. And is it possible the killers from Moscow have been involved in previous crimes in Germany?

Both German prosecutors and the Federal Criminal Police Office have taken an interest in the second question when it comes to an investigation independent of the Berlin park murder. According to information obtained by DER SPIEGEL, the recently launched investigation, codenamed "Novi," has turned up indications that the two alleged Skripal assailants spent three days near Frankfurt in 2014. The investigators would like to find out what they were doing there.

According to the most recent reporting by DER SPIEGEL and Bellingcat, Averyanov likely also had contacts in Germany.

What Did Putin Know?

Is Russian President Vladimir Putin continually informed of the missions undertaken by the GRU unit? Are all attempts apparently aimed at destabilizing the West approved by him? The cyber-attacks, the hacks, the troll factory offensives, the assassinations of state enemies -- all of it?

Not necessarily, but way back in 2006, Putin signed a law that expressly allowed the state to commit murder overseas. "The truth was that Putin had been using deadly force to wipe out his enemies from the first days of his presidency, and the West had long been looking away," British journalist Heidi Blake writes in her recently published book "From Russia with Blood." Even the Soviet Union, she writes, had been expert in the art of killing without leaving an evidence trail.

Blake and her team spent two years investigating mysterious deaths suffered by people with links to Russian oligarchs. The victims had all fallen into disfavor with Putin and fled to Britain. Such as Boris Berezovsky, a Russian mathematician, engineer and businessman who was found dead in his apartment in 2013, hanged by his cashmere scarf. Eight of his close friends and business partners also lost their lives under strange circumstances. In 15 such cases, the journalists found a clear evidence trail leading to Russia.

Blake says the cases are part of Russia's propaganda operation. In her book, she quotes from a televised Putin interview in which he said that he is capable of forgiveness, "but not everything." When the interview asked what he is unable to forgive, Putin answered: "Betrayal."

Germany's Own Skripal Case?

Even shortly after the murder in the Berlin park Kleiner Tiergarten, German politicians began speculating that it may have been a political assassination. German diplomats under the leadership of Foreign Minister Heiko Maas began spreading the word three days after the murder that a political affair was on the horizon and it was unclear how it might end. They spoke of "our own Skripal incident."

The Chancellery and Foreign Ministry initially agreed on a conservative strategy: For as long as the case remained a murder investigation under the leadership of the Berlin city-state authorities, they didn't want to get involved. Only when federal prosecutors took over, according to the plan, would political measures be taken.

During the fall, frustration grew within the German government. After investigators failed to get anywhere with a request for assistance sent to Russian authorities, the government elected to get the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), Germany's foreign intelligence agency, involved.

Via their liaison in Moscow, the BND inquired with the Russians if they could perhaps provide assistance outside of normal official law-enforcement channels, which is not an abnormal request among intelligence agencies. The response was noncommittal. When the BND asked more directly if they could investigate in Russia themselves, the tone became harsher. A German operation, the BND was given to understand, would be interpreted as a hostile act and the Russians threatened to even go so far as to arrest the BND agents. Cooperation from Moscow, it now became clear, would not be forthcoming. In response, the Chancellery elected to expel two Russian agents from the country, a step taken just as German federal prosecutors took over the murder investigation.

Norbert Röttgen, chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee in German parliament and a member of Merkel's conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party, called it an "appropriate measure." He added: "We want good relations with Russia, but not when suspicions of a state-ordered contract killing in Germany are not investigated according to the letter of the law."

'A Joint European Reaction Is Necessary'

The focus of the investigation, Röttgen said, must include an exploration into the question as to whether the Berlin park murder fits into the Russian pattern of killing agents who have defected and other enemies of the state. "Should that be proven, a joint European reaction is necessary, as happened in the Skripal case."

Michael Link, a leading member of the Free Democrats in German parliament, agrees. "We can't jump to conclusions before the investigation is complete. At the same time, though, the parallels to the Skripal case cannot be ignored," Link says. He says there are suspicions that the Kremlin may once again have committed vigilante justice in Europe. "For the German government, that means they must seek out support and urgently place the issue on the agenda of the European foreign ministers meeting scheduled for Monday."


Roderich Kiesewetter, the foreign policy spokesman for the conservatives in parliament, believes the expulsion of the two Russian agents was the correct response. "Depending on the results of the federal prosecutors' investigation," he said, "a clear and unified European response cannot be excluded."

Vadim Krasikov, aka Vadim Sokolov, the suspected murderer in Berlin, lived for many years in Irkutsk. He has two grown children, a daughter and a son. When DER SPIEGEL reached his wife by phone, she was surprised. Her husband left her 16 years ago, she said, and she hadn't heard anything from him since then. "I thought he had died long ago."

By Maik Baumgärtner, Jörg Diehl, Matthias Gebauer, Christo Grozev, Martin Knobbe, Roman Lehberger, Peter Müller, Fidelius Schmid, Jörg Schmitt, Christoph Schult, Tatjana Sutkowaja and Wolf Wiedmann-Schmidt

lunes, 5 de noviembre de 2018

Makrismo: Ascienden post-retiro a militares echados por Garré

Ascenderán a militares que había echado el kirchnerismo pese a que están retirados

El ministro de Defensa, Oscar Aguad, anuló una resolución de Nilda Garré que frenaba la promoción de oficiales que tenían algún parentesco con integrantes de la última dictadura militar
Infobae


El ministro de Defensa de la Nación, Oscar Aguad, anuló el viernes una resolución firmada por la ex ministra Nilda Garré durante el gobierno kirchnerista. En 2010, la entonces funcionaria impidió que un grupo de oficiales del Ejército y la Armada pudiera ascender.

La decisión del Gobierno alcanza a 25 integrantes de las Fuerzas Armadas que actualmente están en situación de retiro y que en 2010 no fueron considerados para los ascensos debido a que tenían algún tipo de parentesco con militares que fueron represores o que ocuparon cargos durante la última dictadura militar.

Muchos de los integrantes de las fuerzas que fueron perjudicados eran en ese momento los mejores promedios de sus promociones, motivo por el que estaban posicionados para poder lograr un ascenso. La decisión del gobierno de Cristina Kirchner les impidió en ese momento seguir el camino normal dentro de la fuerza que cada uno integraba.


 
La ex-terrorista Nilda Garré (Télam)

"Se trató de un acto administrativo que ostentó todos los elementos necesarios para su validez pero que no explicitó las razones por las cuales el personal por ella alcanzado debía ser calificado como se calificó", explicó el ministro en los considerandos de la medida a la que accedió Infobae.

Aguad ordenó que las fuerzas realicen un nuevo cómputo de servicios al personal que fue afectado por las medidas y que se les reconozca el tiempo pasado en retiro como en actividad. Además, solicitó que se les abone la diferencia de los haberes que les hubiera correspondido percibir.

 
El ministro de Defensa de la Nación, Oscar Aguad

El ministro también instruyó a los jefes de los estados mayores de las Fuerzas Armadas para que continúen los trámites de ascenso retroactivo del personal afectado por la resolución establecida durante el gobierno de Cristina Kirchner, que en ese momento habían sido "propuestos para el ascenso".

En diálogo con Infobae, Aguad sostuvo: "Algunos de esos militares, del Ejército y la Armada, serán ascendidos a coroneles y generales, pero no vuelven a la actividad, quedan retirados".

La resolución 1414 que Aguad firmó el último viernes deja sin efecto la 1581 adoptada el 29 de noviembre de 2010 que había firmada la entonces ministra Nilda Garré y a la que consideró "ilegítima".

Dado que al revocar la medida de Garré los militares quedarían en actividad, el texto oficial dispone su pase a retiro "debido al tiempo transcurrido" y solicitó que "se realice un nuevo cómputo de servicios al referido personal, reconociéndoseles el tiempo pasado en retiro como en actividad, abonándoseles la diferencia de los haberes que les hubiera correspondido percibir hasta el dictado de la presente".

viernes, 20 de abril de 2018

Putin suicidó a un periodista que lo investigaba

Russian investigative reporter dies after balcony fall

Authorities have said that Maksim Borodin's death was likely a suicide. But both his editor and friends disagree that Borodin, who wrote about crime and corruption, was suicidial.
DW


Russian reporter Maksim Borodin

Thirty-two-year-old Russian investigative journalist Maksim Borodin died suddenly over the weekend, his employer Novy Den confirmed on Monday. Authorities have described his death as a probable suicide, a narrative contested both by friends and Novy Den.

Borodin was found underneath the balconies of his building in the city of Yekaterinburg on April 12 and died three days later without having recovered consciousness.

According to the US government-funded Radio Free Europe, a policeman spokesman from  Sverdlovsk Oblast said it was "unlikely that this story is of a criminal nature." Police said that the reporter's fifth-floor apartment was locked from the inside, and that there was no sign of a break-in. They added that no suicide note had been found.


Security forces outside Borodin's apartment

Borodin's friend Vyacheslav Bashkov shared some details on Facebook on Sunday about the last time he spoke with the journalist. He claims Borodin called him at 5 in the morning on April 11, alarmed that his building was surrounded by what appeared to be security forces wearing camouflage and masks.

He told Bashkov that he was certain his apartment was about to be searched, but that the authorities were waiting on a warrant. Just one hour later, Bashkov wrote, Borodin called him back to say he had been mistaken and the officers appeared to be carrying out a drill.

Novy Dan's editor-in-chief Polina Rumyantseva has also said that she does not believe Borodin killed himself.

Borodin often wrote about public corruption and secrecy, most recently about Russian mercenaries who had been killed in Syria. Thousands have reportedly been covertly deployed to Syria by a secretive contractor believed to be funded by Yevgeny Prigozhin, a wealthy Putin ally recently indicted by the US over charges that he bankrolled a "troll factory" trying to influence the 2016 presidential election.

The deceased reporter had written an article in February about the bodies of the alleged mercenaries being buried in a nearby village.

martes, 17 de abril de 2018

Guerra contra la Subversión: El desaparecido aparecido en el Balseiro

El extraño caso del científico reaparecido del Instituto Balseiro

Las autoridades del prestigioso Instituto tomaron conocimiento de la noticia hace un mes. La secretaría de Derechos Humanos pidió más información.


Claudio Andrade | Clarín


Un destacado físico nuclear, egresado del Instituto Balseiro (IB), que había sido denunciado como “desaparecido” durante la última dictadura militar, está vivo y radicado en el exterior, según se supo en Bariloche.


Antonio Gentile

A lo largo de los años, Antonio Manuel Gentile recibió numerosos homenajes, se realizaron coloquios y charlas en su nombre y su fotografía acompaña cada acto en el que se recuerda a las víctimas de la represión del Estado entre 1976 y 1983. Sin embargo, una comunicación interna del Instituto que circuló hace un mes afirma que Gentile vive en Estados Unidos junto a su familia. En todo este tiempo nadie supo de su existencia y, según todo indica, él se mantuvo en silencio.

Las autoridades del Balseiro se enteraron meses atrás de que Gentile, hoy con 85 años, vive en el exterior, retirado y junto a los suyos. De modo sorprendente los directivos no emitieron ningún comunicado oficial para dar a conocer la noticia. Hasta el momento sólo enviaron una circular -a la que tuvo acceso Clarín- a su cuerpo docente, donde hacen referencia al dato de manera escueta y con tono alegre.

“A los docentes del Instituto Balseiro”, comienza el texto que no llegó a ser difundido fuera del instituto. “Dada la información recientemente recabada sobre el Dr. Antonio M. Gentile, ex-alumno de la segunda promoción del Instituto, la dirección se complace en comunicar que Antonio se encuentra bien, tiene 85 años y vive en el exterior con su familia. Esta dirección ha podido comunicarse con él permitiendo así confirmar esta muy buena noticia tanto para sus compañeros de promoción como para toda la comunidad del Instituto Balseiro que durante tantos años lo ha recordado preocupada por su ausencia”. La circular lleva la firma de su director, Carlos Balseiro.


Blog del Instituto Balseiro donde se anuncia que Gentile está vivo.

Gentile -que nació el 18 de noviembre de 1933 en Mar del Plata- figura entre los cuatro científicos de la institución desaparecidos durante la dictadura. Los otros tres son: Susana Flora Grinberg, Eduardo Alfredo Pasquini y Manuel Mario Tarchitzky. Pero por una cuestión burocrática su nombre todavía no integra la lista de la CONADEP. Ya en 1996, en Tandil, la Asociación de Física Argentina había propuesto sumarlo. La denuncia formal para hacerlo se concretó recién en 2016 en Bariloche y se encuentra en el trámite de inclusión al listado.

De acuerdo a información provista por la Secretaría de Derechos Humamos de Río Negro, existe en el organismo un expediente donde la denuncia ha quedado registrada. “No tenemos muchos datos pero fue realizada por el Centro Atómico”, señaló una fuente.

Dicho expediente indica que el doctor en Física Nuclear fue visto por última vez en noviembre de 1977 en un aeropuerto de Nueva York, en momentos en que se dirigía hacia la Argentina para buscar a su hermana María Estela Gentile. La mujer había sido secuestrada, y él viajaba a pedido de sus padres que residían en Mar del Plata.


Homenaje a Antonio Gentile, en Bariloche

A lo largo de los últimos 40 años organizaciones de Derechos Humanos, gremios y el propio Centro Atómico informaron que tampoco quedaron rastros del paradero de María Estela. Solo que fue secuestrada en octubre de 1977. Este diario constató que su nombre integra la lista de la CONADEP y que su cuerpo fue entregado a su padre ese mismo año.

En Bariloche, la novedad de que Gentile está vivo en los Estados Unidos también fue registrada en el blog “Homenaje a ex alumnos del Instituto Balseiro detenidos-desaparecidos o asesinados (1976 – 1983)” , dirigido por la física e integrante del área de Resonancia Magnéticas del Centro Atómico, María Teresa Causa. “¡Antonio está vivo! a todos nuestros seguidores y a la comunidad del CAB-IB en general”, indica.

Clarín intentó comunicarse con el área de comunicaciones del instituto y con su director, pero sin resultados. Consultada la física Causa, acerca de que Gentile se encuentra vivo, según ella misma reconoció en su sitio web, respondió: “¿Ah si?”, para cortar sin dar explicaciones.

Desde la Secretaría de Derechos Humanos y Pluralismo Cultural de la Nación, su titular, Claudio Avruj, calificó al caso de “insólito” , pero advirtió que Gentile “no figura en la CONADEP”. Por ahora, desde la Secretaría solicitaron el expediente a la oficina de Río Negro con el propósito de interiorizarse. El pedido lo hizo en persona Mariano Fridman, subsecretario de Memoria, Verdad y Justicia. En ese organismo adelantaron que se comunicarán con la dirección del Instituto Balseiro para que aclaren la situación.

En la APDH Cordillera desconocían que Gentile estuviera vivo. Una fuente sólo agregó que “seguro en el municipio saben más de él que nosotros, en la parte de Cultura”, quitándole trascendencia a un tema sensible.

Gentile, que hoy tiene 85 años, inició en 1954 sus estudios de Matemáticas en la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas de la UBA y se inscribió en el Instituto Balseiro en Bariloche, del que egresó de la carrera de Física en 1959. Integró la segunda promoción de licenciados. De acuerdo al relato que hace de él la Doctora Causa, lo llamaban “Antonito”. “una persona extremadamente inteligente, algo tímida a veces, temperamental otras, de convicciones muy arraigadas, generoso y amante de la naturaleza”, lo define.

Desarrolló su actividad en el grupo de partículas elementales de la CNEA. Fue docente de la cátedra de Electromagnetismo del IB en 1959-60. Hasta 1964 se desempeñó como Jefe de Trabajos Prácticos en la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales de la UBA, en las cátedras de Física Moderna y Electromagnetismo. En los 60 se mudó a Austria con una beca y en 1961 partió a Estados Unidos, a la universidad de Yeshiva en New York. En 1971 publicó una disertación sobre "Propiedades de transporte de estrellas de neutrones". Hasta allí llega su currículum conocido, al menos en la Argentina.

En 2014 y en 2016, el ex juez de la Corte Eugenio Zaffaroni y la titular de Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo, Estela Carlotto, participaron de charlas en el Instituto Balserio dedicadas a la memoria de los desaparecidos. En ambos eventos se puso particular énfasis a los casos de los físicos, incluyendo a Gentile. En los últimos años se realizaron diversos actos en recuerdo de las víctimas en el Centro Cívico de Bariloche y en las instalaciones del prestigioso centro de enseñanza. La imagen de Gentile ampliada en formato de gigantografía siempre estuvo presente detrás de los oradores. En los jardines de la institución las autoridades inauguraron en 2015 el Espacio de la Memoria, en el cual colocaron placas con los nombres de los cuatros científicos desaparecidos. Hace unas semanas fue quitada la del doctor Gentile.

martes, 20 de marzo de 2018

Rusia ataca Occidente con venenos de producción autóctona

A Soviet Nerve Agent Triggers a New Cold War

The poisoning of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter earlier this month has significantly worsened already tense relations between Moscow and the West. The crime marks the first chemical weapons attack on Western Europe since the end of World War II. 
By DER SPIEGEL Staff



Photo Gallery: An Attack on England?Photos
Getty Images


Vil Mirzayanov's home is located at the edge of a forest near Princeton, New Jersey. There's no buzzer, just a gate and behind it a long driveway leading up to the residence. The trees are still covered with snow. The gate opens and a man with a high forehead and white hair stretches out his hand in greeting. It's Mirzayanov, one of the creators behind the poison.

The 83-year-old wearing professorial eyeglasses walks cautiously. He invites the reporter into his living room and takes a seat in a leather armchair. He is ready, he says, to talk about the poison that he helped develop in the late 1980s and early 1990s for the Soviet government. A poison that was recently used in the first neurotoxin attack seen in Western Europe since the end of World War II. The substance is known as Novichok (Russian for "newcomer") and it is used for an entire group of nerve agents. All of them are deadly. In fact, it is one of the most dangerous toxins ever to have been produced by humans.

"I've led the fight against Novichok for the past 26 years," Mirzayanov says of a substance that has always haunted him for half his life.

He didn't invent the toxin, he says, but freely admits that he was involved in its development. He says he tested the substance on animals at the time -- on dogs and other species, which he then watched die in misery. The attack in Britain, he says, is the first time he knows of his poison being used on human beings.

Novichok is the chemical agent that was used to poison former spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in Salisbury, a small, idyllic English city. Both have been fighting for their lives in the hospital ever since.

Tensions Worsen Dramatically

The attack using the nerve agent has triggered a serious diplomatic crisis between Russia, Britain and the entire West, with already tense relations having worsened dramatically. If Russia is unable to provide a better explanation, British Prime Minister Theresa May said earlier this week, then the attack will be seen as "an unlawful use of force by the Russian State against the United Kingdom." She said the nerve agent had been developed in Russia and, assuming that Russia didn't lose control over the toxin, it's "highly likely that Russia was responsible for this reckless and despicable act."

Moscow countered that it had nothing to do with the attack and instead pointed the finger at other possible perpetrators, particularly the West. NATO and the European Union are currently deliberating over a response.

All because of Mirzayanov's poison.

It's a story reminiscent of a spy film. It involves undercover agents and oligarchs, betrayal and revenge. And nerve agents. It seems fitting that Mirzayanov himself is also a former Russian intelligence agent who now lives in exile in the United States.

He seems almost happy that someone has come to listen to him. And yet the whole world now wants to learn more about the kind of research he was doing in Mikhail Gorbachev's secret laboratories.

Mirzayanov began working as a chemist for the State Research Institute of Organic Chemistry and Technology (GosNIIOKhT) in the mid-1960s. Later, he and other researchers were requisitioned to a military laboratory responsible for the production of chemical weapons, a top-secret program that operated under the codename "Foliant." In the mid-1980s, he was chosen to lead the institute's counterespionage department.

Novichok is "extremely dangerous," he says. "You're holding death in your hands. It just takes a moment and then you're gone." He says a person exposed to the kind of dose received by Skripal and his daughter will never be totally healthy again. Mirzayanov saw how another colleague accidentally poisoned himself with Novichok and slowly died, despite immediately being given an antidote. He says it is 10 times as potent as conventional nerve agents and causes an extremely painful death. It can be absorbed by the respiratory tract, orally or through the skin. It blocks communication between nerve cells and muscles and leads to cramps, respiratory paralysis and cardiac arrest.

Mirzayanov says he's certain that the Kremlin was behind the attack on Sergei Skripal. But how certain can one be?

Tragedy Strikes an Idyllic British City

The attack on Skripal in the heart of England is mysterious, there's no other way of putting it. There are numerous unanswered questions: How the drug was administered? Why Skripal? Why now?

Skripal, 66, is a former Russian agent and defector, who took British citizenship and has lived since 2011 in an inconspicuous red brick house in Salisbury in southern England. On March 3, his daughter Yulia, 33, came from Moscow for a visit.

The next day, a Sunday, father and daughter drove together to the city's historical center, home to a famous medieval cathedral. They parked Skripal's red BMW in front of a supermarket at 1:40 p.m. and went to a nearby pub.

At 2:20 p.m., the two entered the Zizzi pizzeria, where Skripal is reported to have acted strangely. Witnesses said the sturdily built man began complaining loudly about the long wait and cursed, as his daughter ate quietly next to him. The two left the restaurant about an hour later and likely headed back to their car, but they never got there. At 4:15 p.m., they were spotted by passersby slumped unconscious on a bench in a nearby park. They have been unresponsive ever since. Both are still in the hospital, along with police officer Nick Bailey, who was also exposed to the poison after being the first person to arrive at the scene.

On Thursday of this week, 11 days after the attack, the park bench remains wrapped in a yellow and white protective tarp. Two police officers stand guard in front of the small park. A playground is located nearby. There's a hairdresser next door, a gift shop and a New Age shop selling crystals.

"I was sitting with friends just a few feet away in a pub," says Alex Whitty, 33, who runs a nearby café. "We thought it was a homeless person who had passed out. When I got home, I saw on television that it was a Russian agent. Unbelievable. An agent who was murdered. Here in Salisbury."

Salisbury looks like a place straight out of the picture books. Located two hours from London, the streets here in this city of 40,000 are hedge-lined and could be the scene of a Harry Potter book. Low brick houses, narrow streets. Stonehenge is located nearby, as is, interestingly, Porton Down, the British government's secret chemical weapons center. It's home to a cathedral where a copy of the Magna Carta, the document that launched democracy in Britain, is on display. And now this.

Salisbury has become a crime scene. The secret service has taken over the investigation from the local police and Skripal's home has been sealed off, as has the park and the cemetery where his wife is buried. After first advising residents to just wash their things, the authorities have now grown more cautious. No one knows how badly the area has been contaminated. The restaurant table where Skripal sat was destroyed under strict safety precautions.

Several hundred anti-terror police and chemical weapons experts with the British military are now on the case, trying to determine how and when the poison was administered. At the time of publication, investigators were focusing on the vehicle. The poison may have been applied to the door handle or it may have entered the car through the vent. Even the tow truck that was used to remove the car from the crime scene is being tested for traces.

Why Skripal?

The biggest riddle investigators are trying to solve, however, is why Skripal? And why would such a spectacular and risky attack be risked on him in particular?

In the world of espionage, Skripal, who is originally from Kaliningrad, is only considered to have been a peripheral figure. A former colonel with the Russian military intelligence service GRU, he was stationed in Spain shortly after the collapse of the Soviet Union. It is there that he was reportedly recruited by Britain's MI6 in mid-1995. He was given the codename "Forthwith."

The British claim that Skripal was extremely useful, even having supplied the MI6 with GRU's complete telephone directory and the identities of hundreds of GRU people. He received between $5,000 and $6,000 per meeting as remuneration.

He doesn't seem to have made much of an impression on the people who know him. "He's a nice, normal person," says Colonel Vladimir Koshelev, who was a former member of a GRU commando unit. They would meet and drink wine together.

The Brits continued to tap Skripal until his cover was blown in 2004, with a Spanish double agent having caught wind of his treason. A military court sentenced him in 2006 to a relatively mild sentence of 13 years in a labor camp for high treason. Just four years later, he was freed as part of a prisoner exchange and was allowed to leave Russia for Britain.

In England, he has led a relatively normal life without any cover, and it doesn't appear he was too worried about his safety. Perhaps because it seemed rather far-fetched that a country would kill a spy it had previously swapped. Skripal hasn't made any effort in Salisbury to hide his true identity: When he joined a local model railway club, he registered using his real name. Fellow members say he can hold his alcohol.

But in his new life as a Brit, Skripal has suffered an unusual number of setbacks. His wife Lyudmila died of cancer in 2012, and last year he was informed that his son Alexander had died in St. Petersburg, apparently from liver failure. In March 2016, Skripal's brother Valeri died in a car accident. It's a string of misfortune that British investigators are now reevaluating in light of this month's events.

Regardless who was behind the attack on Skripal, the question of the motive cannot be separated from that of the substance that was used. Why, after all, would a military-grade nerve agent be used?

Was the point to silence Skripal? Speaking against that theory is the fact that Skripal wasn't believed to be in possession of any valuable secrets. He left the GRU military intelligence service way back in 1999. And at the time of his release from prison, the Russian intelligence services had to have reviewed whether he would present any potential threat -- otherwise they never would have agreed to a prisoner swap. Skripal's old GRU comrade Koshelev also considers the idea to be absurd, especially given that other known traitors are still alive. "I really hope that Skripal survives," he says, "that he is tormented by his conscience and is afraid."

Was this a revenge attack? That would be a plausible motive for an individual perpetrator. Skripal did, after all, destroy enough careers that he many have awakened the desire for revenge in a number of them. But intelligence services seldom carry out revenge attacks, especially if they have the potential to jeopardize future exchange deals.

Perhaps the Kremlin was also seeking to send a message precisely at the time of Russia's presidential election on Sunday. By deploying a military-grade nerve agent that can be traced back to Russia, it may be sending a warning to potential defectors and Russians living abroad that no one is safe.

That would jibe with the message Putin sent out in 2010, when a group of Russian agents in the U.S. had their covers blown -- the same agents who were later traded for Skripal and others. Putin was asked in his annual question-and-answer show on television how traitors should be dealt with. In contrast to Soviet times, Putin said, there was no longer any special department for liquidating traitors. He said such means were no longer resorted to.

But, he continued, traitors would "bite the dust," and the "30 pieces of silver" he received for his treachery would become "lodged in his throat," and a man who chose such a fate would "regret it a thousand times." It was classic Putin to provide two contradictory answers to the same question. Formally, he was denying the use of violence, but he was threatening violence at the same time.

On Thursday, the governments of Britain, France, Germany and the United States issued a joint statement noting that the UK has "thoroughly briefed its allies that it was highly likely that Russia was responsible for the attack." That means that the British have shared intelligence data with their partners.

The statement says the countries "share the United Kingdom's assessment that there is no plausible alternative explanation." Russia's failure to address the questions asked by Britain "further underlines Russia's responsibility." It also implores Russia to disclose its Novichok program to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and to answer any of its questions. The statement demonstrated unity among allies -- at the end of a week that began with cracks showing between them.

New Sanctions for Moscow?

With her dramatic appearance on Monday night, Theresa May made clear how serious the British are about the issue. She issued an ultimatum to Moscow, leaving a backdoor open for the Russians to provide an explanation for how the chemical weapon could have reached Salisbury if the government was not involved.

But as it has done so often in the past, rather than addressing the allegations or offering its help in the investigation, the Russians went on the counterattack. In the Russian capital, officials openly mocked the British. Maria Zakharova, the brash spokeswoman for the Russian Foreign Ministry, disparaged what she called a "circus show in the British parliament" and cracked Sherlock Holmes jokes. Little wonder, then, that May accused Moscow of reacting with "sarcasm, contempt and defiance."

The Russians, for their part, called on the British to go public with the British intelligence services' knowledge about the toxic agent used and to turn that evidence over to the OPCW. Unsurprisingly, some in Moscow began suggesting that London was behind the attack and that it had been an effort to discredit Russia. Foreign Minister Boris Johnson announced that the British government would allow international experts with the OPCW to analyze the poison that had been used.

Since Tuesday, though, officials in London have been spending a considerable amount of time getting allies to back the country's position. Initially, there had been discord between the Western allies. The French president's spokesperson demanded more information and U.S. President Donald Trump at first delayed expressing clear support for Britain. But Thursday's statement appeared to clear that up.

But what measures can the allies now take against the Russians?

The issue is expected to be addressed at next week's EU summit. On Monday, German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas will attend his first regular meeting of EU foreign ministers. Germany's new top diplomat didn't mince words in criticizing Russia during his first speech at the Foreign Ministry on Wednesday.

For the EU, showing solidarity with Britain provides an opportunity to demonstrate that the bloc is prepared to work with the UK on security policy issues despite difficult ongoing Brexit talks. The EU could theoretically expand existing sanctions by adding things like additional travel restrictions for people close to Putin. But that, too, might be difficult given that a few EU members would like to see the existing sanctions lifted.

And NATO? Concerns briefly circulated at headquarters in Brussels that Britain might invoke NATO's Article 5 joint defense clause. Under the clause, an attack on one member is considered an attack against all. But it would also require unanimity among all member states, which may be why Britain discarded the idea, at least for now.

Instead the NATO Council agreed on Wednesday to a joint statement. The "attack," it stated, "was a clear breach of international norms and agreements." The 28 allies also offered Britain "their support in the conduct of the ongoing investigation."

At the same time, the U.S. sparked irritation with its refusal to include the name of the nerve agent -- Novichok -- used in the communique. The session of the NATO Council even had to be adjourned due to the American refusal. Ultimately, though, the Americans backed down, though the reasons for their original hesitancy remain unclear.

For now, the British government will have to decide for itself which measures to take. Given its view that the Skripal case was an armed attack, it could invoke Article 51 of the UN Charter and undertake self-defense measures.

Still, the sanctions announced by May on Wednesday -- after the ultimatum expired -- were far from the maximum escalation possible. London announced it would temporarily expel 23 Russian diplomats and suspend high-level contacts with Moscow. In addition, no member of the British government or the royal family will travel to the World Cup this summer in Russia. It's not expected that these measures will do much to impress Russia. And the truth is the Britain actually did have possible measures at its disposal that could have hit Russia's elite hard.

Londongrad

London has a very special meaning for Russia. The city is a playground for many Russians -- something of a safe harbor. The City of London, as the hub of the financial industry here is called, is to a large degree little more than a massive bank where the world's super-rich can securely park their wealth.

Every Russian oligarch knows that he could lose his assets at any time. And those who are rich in Russia also know that their wealth is only borrowed. Which is why Russia's upper class loves London. It offers legal security -- and the kind of institutions that are lacking at home. Money is relatively safe once it arrives in London. The British capital is like landing on Free Parking in Monopoly. It's a place where you can take a deep breath before heading back into the battle for money. An estimated 300,000 people with Russian roots live in Britain. In addition to the super-rich, it has also long been home to members of the Russian opposition.

miércoles, 21 de febrero de 2018

La persecución a los militares victoriosos de la guerra antisubversiva

El terrorismo de los 70 y la violación al estatuto de Roma

Por Carta de Lectores - Tribuna de Periodistas




VIOLACIÓN FLAGRANTE/INSEGURIDAD JURÍDICA

De acuerdo a la carta del lector Carlos Alberto Louge publicada en La Nación de la fecha, entiendo que el Estado Argentino ha violado deliberadamente el Estatuto de Roma aplicándolo en forma retroactiva, contra lo que el mismo Estatuto, acorde a principios universales de legalidad prohíbe expresamente.

Asimismo incumple las recomendaciones del Tratado de Ginebra para la resolución de conflictos internos "procurando una amplia amnistía", haciendo todo lo contrario al anular el indulto de un Presidente democráticamente elegido.

Ambas medidas justificaron los juicios contra militares y civiles involucrados en la guerra de los 70 (Firmenich así la denominó), agregando la exclusión adicional de las organizaciones terroristas de la figura de "lesa humanidad', decisión injustificada en el mencionado Estatuto.

Creo que mantener la angustiosa situación de los 2000 Presos Políticos heredados del gobierno kirchnerista, es ahora absoluta responsabilidad del gobierno de Cambiemos, evidencia de inseguridad jurídica y de complicidad con la venganza del terrorismo.


Santiago Floresa